Home » AMERICAS » “Otherness”: The Link Between Culture and Feminism
7907076958_d331fd489f_z

“Otherness”: The Link Between Culture and Feminism

I am very emotionally and intellectually affected by the idea of ‘otherness’- meaning that I find myself unable to champion either a purely South Asian standpoint or a generalized ‘Western’ stance on social issues, especially feminism and it’s relationship with culture. This means that I am perceived as the ‘other’ to people from both worlds. In short, I am an Indian expatriate, inexperienced with my maternal and paternal languages. Despite this, I grew up eating ‘rice and dal’ everyday for lunch (a South Indian staple) and I’m comfortable eating with my hands. I speak an “accentless” English but when I am angry or speaking to my family, I inevitably find myself being sharper on my consonants. I’m somewhat forgiven for my lack of “Indian-ness” by relatives and other expatriate friends. However, beyond these superficial occurrences, certain combinations of conservatism, unequal gender roles and cultural identity have made an impression on me.

There are many faces of Indian feminism, just as in the West – the conversation has been had and re-had with marginal real-life improvements and there is little new to say about it. Therein lies a glimpse of the true problem-gap between cultural identity and feminism in India, and I daresay to an extent in the West. We’ve come up with different variations of feminism for various cultural contexts, but there is limited discussion about the ways in which to move beyond the intellectual bubble. This bubble has been formed around the intellectual nature of feminism but has not been adequately conveyed in context of the nuances and challenges of everyday life in Indian society for both men and women. The purpose of how feminism or equality of the genders has widely been acknowledged in terms of economic benefits, but not in terms of social progress since it is hard to gauge with respect to India’s religious diversity and hierarchical society.

In this sense, a valid defense is that someone who is representative of the ‘one’ or the ‘other’ cannot speak for the many different contexts at hand. In this way, my cultural “otherness” is shared with the large feminist-oriented culture in India and seen as not really belonging. Identity has always been a transient concept, but somewhere along the way South Asian cultures decided that it shouldn’t be and this became reflected in social issues too.

I recently came across this TED talk by Malala Yousafzi’s father, Ziauddin Yousafzi. He was speaking about patriarchal societies in a way that acknowledged the possibilities for a different kind of approach to the ‘girl-child’. He is evidently a well-educated individual, but is also very clearly not from an urbanized context. Western influence was literally the most improbable factor in the way he chose to raise his daughter. Similar to how Ziauddin Yousafzi chose to bring up his daughter in a home that allowed her to develop her own sense of independence, free of cultural hangups, so has my life as an Indian been more-or-less free of such restraints without completely altering my cultural roots. In order to push out of the intellectual bubble-wrap that shields feminism from the difficult question of social progress, it must start as a personally generated phenomenon. Phenomenon implies that we don’t need to rely on a correct or singular version of feminism. It is contextual to each person, resulting in a generation of men and women that are willing to widen their cultural values without compromising them.

Once again, we come back to what authority I have to say this – especially since I have been more or less spared from the often-suffocating expectations of Indian conservatism, and one could say my cultural boundaries are hardly existent. The truth is, I speak from first-hand experience. My father was brought up in rural Gunadala in Andhra Pradesh and my mother, in colonial Bangalore, Karnataka. To say they had different childhood values growing up and a subsequently different viewpoint on child rearing is an understatement. They grew up in India with many social restrictions, yet there were decisive shifts in choosing to let most of these values go by adopting a more liberalized approach to raising us. As a result, I was not constrained to the belief system of my parents. Freedom to study in my field of choice, freedom to marry the person of my choice, freedom to disagree: this was all a result of a personal choice made by my parents for which I am grateful.

Therefore, I know for a fact that growing out of the cultural mould into which you’re born is alienating. There is nothing worse than being rejected by your birth culture and labeled as ‘other’ (which is often a synonym for a generic wannabe for the West). The fact is that there is nothing pegging feminist values to Western culture- indeed, South Asia has a history and far more advanced track record of female leadership. In the Indian home, the mother is the backbone, if not a breadwinner as well. The issue at hand is that despite all this – the cultural mould for women remains narrow. It’s perpetuated in wedding rituals, marriage, child-rearing versus career building, the same as in the West. So often, the platitudes that mothers pass onto daughters about the nature of men and patriarchy are nurtured, not actually deconstructed. This is why raising your daughter in the way that Malala and myself were raised is important in allowing a person to really understand themselves and where they’ve come, from but also in terms of seeing these cultural expectations for what they are: changeable.

To not speak loudly, to not back-talk, to be neat- all these things are seen as positive and encouraged in the Indian home. When people say that Indian women are “taught” to be a certain way – this isn’t some broad reflection on the education system or Indians as generally bigoted people. It comes from this fixed gender role that’s part of culture. My Indian parents were no different in this respect, except that they have grown to accept my “non-traditional characteristics” because they consciously encouraged it in my formative years. Even in context, I had to exercise my freedom of thought and independence – it was not assumed of me. The bottom line is, I am an Indian but I am also a feminist. I am a person without a home country but I have a root culture. Feminism cannot fit squarely into the current expectations of South Asian women. This culture should not be reduced to narrow social norms, resistant to “otherness”, when it has been shown that there is so much room for a brighter future when those boundaries are widened.

– Hiba Ganta

Image License: Some rights reserved Zuhair Ahmad 2012

About Hiba

Check Also

9037189098_cd5ea2a702_o

Gutting of Ethics Committee: A Great Republican Irony

All eyes have been on Donald Trump and the executive branch as the Presidential inauguration came ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *