<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Political Bouillon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thepoliticalbouillon.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thepoliticalbouillon.com</link>
	<description>...the diet of bright young minds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 18:48:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Président Hollande: A Chance for Europe? by ThePoliBouillon</title>
		<link>http://thepoliticalbouillon.com/president-hollande-a-chance-for-europe/#comment-806</link>
		<dc:creator>ThePoliBouillon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 18:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepoliticalbouillon.com/?p=2964#comment-806</guid>
		<description>TPB&#039;s William Debost explores what Hollande&#039;s victory in the recent French Presidential Elections might mean for... http://t.co/6s18ltBR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TPB&#8217;s William Debost explores what Hollande&#8217;s victory in the recent French Presidential Elections might mean for&#8230; <a href="http://t.co/6s18ltBR" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/6s18ltBR</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Family Dinner&#8230; by ThePoliBouillon</title>
		<link>http://thepoliticalbouillon.com/a-family-dinner/#comment-804</link>
		<dc:creator>ThePoliBouillon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 01:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepoliticalbouillon.com/?p=2954#comment-804</guid>
		<description>A family dinner in Montreal right now....

http://t.co/5LfPxjBn http://t.co/us4eHgr3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A family dinner in Montreal right now&#8230;.</p>
<p><a href="http://t.co/5LfPxjBn" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/5LfPxjBn</a> <a href="http://t.co/us4eHgr3" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/us4eHgr3</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ach! Ein Greek! by Matthieu</title>
		<link>http://thepoliticalbouillon.com/ach-ein-greek/#comment-803</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthieu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 16:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepoliticalbouillon.com/?p=2591#comment-803</guid>
		<description>Hey, Koalaman. You can see some of my new cartoons at http://santerrecomique.wordpress.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Koalaman. You can see some of my new cartoons at <a href="http://santerrecomique.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://santerrecomique.wordpress.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ach! Ein Greek! by Koalaman</title>
		<link>http://thepoliticalbouillon.com/ach-ein-greek/#comment-795</link>
		<dc:creator>Koalaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 14:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepoliticalbouillon.com/?p=2591#comment-795</guid>
		<description>Are there going to be new cartoons soon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are there going to be new cartoons soon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sustainomics &amp; Millennium Consumption Goals (MCGs): The future of global sustainability by Sylvestre mbanza</title>
		<link>http://thepoliticalbouillon.com/sustainomics-millennium-consumption-goals-mcgs-the-future-of-global-sustainability/#comment-794</link>
		<dc:creator>Sylvestre mbanza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 10:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepoliticalbouillon.com/?p=2565#comment-794</guid>
		<description>You have done a very good job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have done a very good job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ach! Ein Greek! by Koalaman</title>
		<link>http://thepoliticalbouillon.com/ach-ein-greek/#comment-792</link>
		<dc:creator>Koalaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 21:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepoliticalbouillon.com/?p=2591#comment-792</guid>
		<description>Nice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Summing up a Beginning by Admin</title>
		<link>http://thepoliticalbouillon.com/summing-up-a-beginning/#comment-789</link>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 13:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepoliticalbouillon.com/?p=2821#comment-789</guid>
		<description>Thanks for all the good work Isabelle! It was a pleasure working with you this year!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for all the good work Isabelle! It was a pleasure working with you this year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Another military coup in Africa? by Jck</title>
		<link>http://thepoliticalbouillon.com/another-military-coup-in-africa/#comment-709</link>
		<dc:creator>Jck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 11:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepoliticalbouillon.com/?p=2611#comment-709</guid>
		<description>&quot;Resources definitely play a key role but I don’t fully agree with the fact that every African is ready “to pledge all their social reasons for personal gains”. I think it is important that Africans in terms of resources come back to the ideologies of Kwame Nkrumah, Patrice Lumumba and Thomas Sankara and support that ideology with Pan-Africanism.&quot;

&quot;The revolutionary tries to change the old; the rebel simply comes out of the old, just as a snake slips out of the old skin and never looks back&quot; 
Stand up Africa!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Resources definitely play a key role but I don’t fully agree with the fact that every African is ready “to pledge all their social reasons for personal gains”. I think it is important that Africans in terms of resources come back to the ideologies of Kwame Nkrumah, Patrice Lumumba and Thomas Sankara and support that ideology with Pan-Africanism.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The revolutionary tries to change the old; the rebel simply comes out of the old, just as a snake slips out of the old skin and never looks back&#8221;<br />
Stand up Africa!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Another military coup in Africa? by Jck</title>
		<link>http://thepoliticalbouillon.com/another-military-coup-in-africa/#comment-708</link>
		<dc:creator>Jck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 11:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepoliticalbouillon.com/?p=2611#comment-708</guid>
		<description>A rebel, as I use the term, is a spiritual phenomenon. His approach is absolutely individual. His vision is that if we want to change the society, we have to change the individual. Society in itself does not exist; it is only a word, like &quot;crowd&quot; - if you go to find it, you will not find it anywhere. Wherever you encounter someone, you will encounter an individual. &quot;Society&quot; is only a collective name - just a name, not a reality - with no substance.

The individual has a soul, has a possibility of evolution, of change, of transformation. Hence, the difference is tremendous.

The rebel is the very essence of religion. He brings into the world a change of consciousness - and if the consciousness changes, then the structure of the society is bound to follow it. But vice versa is not the case, and it has been proved by all the revolutions because they have failed.

A revolutionary is part of the political world; his approach is through politics. His understanding is that changing the social structure is enough to change the human being.
No revolution has yet succeeded in changing human beings; but it seems we are not aware of the fact. We still go on thinking in terms of revolution, of changing society, of changing the government, of changing the bureaucracy, of changing laws, political systems. Feudalism, capitalism, communism, socialism, fascism - they were all in their own way revolutionary. They all have failed, and failed utterly, because man has remained the same.

We have to be rebels, not revolutionaries. The revolutionary belongs to a very mundane sphere; the rebel and his rebelliousness are sacred. The revolutionary cannot stand alone; he needs a crowd, a political party, a government. He needs power - and power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

Human consciousness has not grown for centuries. Only once in a while someone blossoms - but in millions of people, the blossoming of one person is not a rule, it is the exception. And because that person is alone, the crowd cannot tolerate him. His existence becomes a kind of humiliation; his very presence feels insulting because he opens your eyes, makes you aware of your potential and your future. And it hurts your ego that you have done nothing to grow, to be more conscious, to be more loving, more ecstatic, more creative, more silent - to create a beautiful world around you.

Hence a Gautam Buddha or a Chuang Tzu hurts you because they have blossomed and you are just standing there.

The world has known only very few rebels. But now is the time: if humanity proves incapable of producing a large number of rebels, a rebellious spirit, then our days on the earth are numbered. Then the coming decades may become our graveyard. We are coming very close to that point.

We have to change our consciousness, create more meditative energy in the world, create more lovingness. We have to destroy the old - its ugliness, its rotten ideologies, its stupid discriminations, idiotic superstitions - and create a new human being with fresh eyes, with new values. A discontintuity with the past - that&#039;s the meaning of rebelliousness.

These three words will help you to understand: reform, revolution, and rebellion.

Reform: 
means a modification. The old remains and you give it a new form, a new shape - it is a kind of renovation to an old building. The original structure remains; you whitewash it, you clean it, you create a few windows, a few new doors.

Revolution:
goes deeper than reform. The old remains, but more changes are introduced, changes even in its basic structure. You are not only changing its color and opening a few new windows and doors, but perhaps building new stories, taking it higher into the sky. But the old is not destroyed, it remains hidden behind the new; in fact, it remains the very foundation of the new. Revolution is a continuity with the old.

Rebellion: 
is a discontinuity. It is not reform, it is not revolution; it is simply disconnecting yourself from all that is old. The old religions, the old political ideologies, the old human being - all that is old, you disconnect yourself from it. You start life afresh, from scratch.

&lt;&gt;

The future needs no more revolutions. The future needs a new experiment, which has not been tried yet. Although for thousands of years there have been rebels, they remained alone - individuals. Perhaps the time was not ripe for them. But now the time is not only ripe....if you don&#039;t hurry, the time has come to an end. In the coming decades, either mankind will disappear or a new human being with a new vision will appear on the earth. That new human being will be a rebel.

Excerpt from &quot;The Book of Understanding&quot; - Jck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A rebel, as I use the term, is a spiritual phenomenon. His approach is absolutely individual. His vision is that if we want to change the society, we have to change the individual. Society in itself does not exist; it is only a word, like &#8220;crowd&#8221; &#8211; if you go to find it, you will not find it anywhere. Wherever you encounter someone, you will encounter an individual. &#8220;Society&#8221; is only a collective name &#8211; just a name, not a reality &#8211; with no substance.</p>
<p>The individual has a soul, has a possibility of evolution, of change, of transformation. Hence, the difference is tremendous.</p>
<p>The rebel is the very essence of religion. He brings into the world a change of consciousness &#8211; and if the consciousness changes, then the structure of the society is bound to follow it. But vice versa is not the case, and it has been proved by all the revolutions because they have failed.</p>
<p>A revolutionary is part of the political world; his approach is through politics. His understanding is that changing the social structure is enough to change the human being.<br />
No revolution has yet succeeded in changing human beings; but it seems we are not aware of the fact. We still go on thinking in terms of revolution, of changing society, of changing the government, of changing the bureaucracy, of changing laws, political systems. Feudalism, capitalism, communism, socialism, fascism &#8211; they were all in their own way revolutionary. They all have failed, and failed utterly, because man has remained the same.</p>
<p>We have to be rebels, not revolutionaries. The revolutionary belongs to a very mundane sphere; the rebel and his rebelliousness are sacred. The revolutionary cannot stand alone; he needs a crowd, a political party, a government. He needs power &#8211; and power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.</p>
<p>Human consciousness has not grown for centuries. Only once in a while someone blossoms &#8211; but in millions of people, the blossoming of one person is not a rule, it is the exception. And because that person is alone, the crowd cannot tolerate him. His existence becomes a kind of humiliation; his very presence feels insulting because he opens your eyes, makes you aware of your potential and your future. And it hurts your ego that you have done nothing to grow, to be more conscious, to be more loving, more ecstatic, more creative, more silent &#8211; to create a beautiful world around you.</p>
<p>Hence a Gautam Buddha or a Chuang Tzu hurts you because they have blossomed and you are just standing there.</p>
<p>The world has known only very few rebels. But now is the time: if humanity proves incapable of producing a large number of rebels, a rebellious spirit, then our days on the earth are numbered. Then the coming decades may become our graveyard. We are coming very close to that point.</p>
<p>We have to change our consciousness, create more meditative energy in the world, create more lovingness. We have to destroy the old &#8211; its ugliness, its rotten ideologies, its stupid discriminations, idiotic superstitions &#8211; and create a new human being with fresh eyes, with new values. A discontintuity with the past &#8211; that&#8217;s the meaning of rebelliousness.</p>
<p>These three words will help you to understand: reform, revolution, and rebellion.</p>
<p>Reform: <br />
means a modification. The old remains and you give it a new form, a new shape &#8211; it is a kind of renovation to an old building. The original structure remains; you whitewash it, you clean it, you create a few windows, a few new doors.</p>
<p>Revolution:<br />
goes deeper than reform. The old remains, but more changes are introduced, changes even in its basic structure. You are not only changing its color and opening a few new windows and doors, but perhaps building new stories, taking it higher into the sky. But the old is not destroyed, it remains hidden behind the new; in fact, it remains the very foundation of the new. Revolution is a continuity with the old.</p>
<p>Rebellion: <br />
is a discontinuity. It is not reform, it is not revolution; it is simply disconnecting yourself from all that is old. The old religions, the old political ideologies, the old human being &#8211; all that is old, you disconnect yourself from it. You start life afresh, from scratch.</p>
<p>&lt;&gt;</p>
<p>The future needs no more revolutions. The future needs a new experiment, which has not been tried yet. Although for thousands of years there have been rebels, they remained alone &#8211; individuals. Perhaps the time was not ripe for them. But now the time is not only ripe&#8230;.if you don&#8217;t hurry, the time has come to an end. In the coming decades, either mankind will disappear or a new human being with a new vision will appear on the earth. That new human being will be a rebel.</p>
<p>Excerpt from &#8220;The Book of Understanding&#8221; &#8211; Jck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pakistan’s Cringing Soul: Stop Unmanned Aerial Warfare by Hugo</title>
		<link>http://thepoliticalbouillon.com/pakistans-cringing-soul-stop-unmanned-aerial-warfare/#comment-705</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 03:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepoliticalbouillon.com/?p=2606#comment-705</guid>
		<description>Here are a few thoughts/ fact:
If interested, you should real David Kilkullen&#039;s the Accidental Guerilla (2006), his thesis: foreign intervention in grey zones, which already have radical Islamist elements, alienates the local population, thus making the latter sensible to extremist ideology and rhetoric, and fueling a cycle of violence. The U.S. should move towards a population-centric approach instead of an enemy- one. 

Also, last time I checked, U.S. drones are used in six countries: Libya, Yemen, Somalia, Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan, with some overflying over Iranian borders. 

The reference to video made me think of military contracting firms in Iraq who have deals with the visual electronic industry for training. 

The Talibans are only one actor in the middle of regional dynamics: the U.S. has to deal with the Pakistani government, and they are on tense terms. Islamabad is also playing between both Washington and Beijing alliances (China is hoping to gain influence in the Indian ocean). Pakistan is trying to influence Afghanistan and Kashmiri politics. The military industrial complex (which has been strengthened by US/China) and internal security services have also rogue elements and underlying networks, and are reluctant to see their state&#039;s sovereignty breached by the U.S. There is also nuclear deterrence involved with India...

We have to question a short-term driven American policy making in the region, as well as acknowledge the balances of power between different states.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are a few thoughts/ fact:<br />
If interested, you should real David Kilkullen&#8217;s the Accidental Guerilla (2006), his thesis: foreign intervention in grey zones, which already have radical Islamist elements, alienates the local population, thus making the latter sensible to extremist ideology and rhetoric, and fueling a cycle of violence. The U.S. should move towards a population-centric approach instead of an enemy- one. </p>
<p>Also, last time I checked, U.S. drones are used in six countries: Libya, Yemen, Somalia, Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan, with some overflying over Iranian borders. </p>
<p>The reference to video made me think of military contracting firms in Iraq who have deals with the visual electronic industry for training. </p>
<p>The Talibans are only one actor in the middle of regional dynamics: the U.S. has to deal with the Pakistani government, and they are on tense terms. Islamabad is also playing between both Washington and Beijing alliances (China is hoping to gain influence in the Indian ocean). Pakistan is trying to influence Afghanistan and Kashmiri politics. The military industrial complex (which has been strengthened by US/China) and internal security services have also rogue elements and underlying networks, and are reluctant to see their state&#8217;s sovereignty breached by the U.S. There is also nuclear deterrence involved with India&#8230;</p>
<p>We have to question a short-term driven American policy making in the region, as well as acknowledge the balances of power between different states.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

